Comments on: Starfield DLSS 3 Benchmarks & Impressions

By: BT-7274

BT-7274 — Mon, 13 Nov 2023 07:07:19 +0000

In reply to connos. His name implies that it's impossible.

By: mareknr

mareknr — Mon, 13 Nov 2023 02:50:42 +0000

In reply to Yeltnerb1. DLSS 3 = Upscaling + Frame Generation + Reflex

By: DamZe

DamZe — Sun, 12 Nov 2023 10:20:20 +0000

In reply to ZIGS. I think you underestimate Bethesda's technical incompetence.

By: connos

connos — Sun, 12 Nov 2023 07:52:08 +0000

In reply to mohamed djm. Stop being so dumb

By: connos

connos — Sun, 12 Nov 2023 07:51:41 +0000

In reply to Bingo89. Stop being so low iq please

By: PB

PB — Sun, 12 Nov 2023 03:49:41 +0000

John, could you please consider overlaying the minimum FPS bars on top of the average FPS bars?

It’ll make the charts significantly more readable.
Example:
https://www.techspot.com/articles-info/1912/bench/TS_1080p.png

By: Kobi Blade

Kobi Blade — Sun, 12 Nov 2023 02:40:49 +0000

In reply to ZIGS. Considering they improved CPU performance, and not GPU performance, your claims are ridiculous at best. NVidia having CPU overheard issues driver side was hit harder, that is purely NVidia fault.

By: Bingo89

Bingo89 — Sat, 11 Nov 2023 20:07:22 +0000

this game was ruined by amd for 2 months for selling 7700xt and 7800xt cards

By: Yeltnerb1

Yeltnerb1 — Sat, 11 Nov 2023 19:59:15 +0000

DLSS 3 = Frame Generation

By: Ned Stark

Ned Stark — Sat, 11 Nov 2023 17:05:09 +0000

In reply to ZIGS. Even for a gimped game it seemed worse than other gimped games. That said, yeah, it's clear some companies realized that they can't optimize the game enough and realized it's not worth it to keep the AMD exclusivity. At least Starfield and Jedi Survivor did, though Survivor sucks even after addition of DLSS.